208 Cal.App.2d 167, 19416, Pemberton v. Ince Bros. Pipeline Const. Co.

Citation: 208 Cal.App.2d 167, 25 Cal.Rptr. 38

Opinion Judge: [10] Shoemaker

Party Name: Pemberton v. Ince Bros. Pipeline Const. Co.

Attorney: [7] Edward J. Niland and Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland & Teerlink for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Campbell, Custer, Warburton & Britton, George A. Strong, John P. Whitney and F. H. Pearson, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday October 03, 1962

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

208 Cal.App.2d 167, 19416, Pemberton v. Ince Bros. Pipeline Const. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 48 Cal.2d 655, 24392, Daggett v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
California - 50 Cal.2d 153, 24748, Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California - 55 Cal.2d 314, 7191, Pobor v. Western Pac. R. Co.
California - 134 Cal.App.2d 270, 20784, Zellers v. State of California
California - 137 Cal.App.2d 237, 21191, Guardianship of Levy

See all quotations