208 A.2d 651 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1965), C--143, Cahill v. Heckel

Citation: 208 A.2d 651, 87 N.J.Super. 201

Opinion Judge: [10] Herbert

Party Name: Daniel CAHILL and Ollie Cahill, his wife, and Joseph Stypa and Betty Lou Stypa, his wife, and Elias Hoffman and Jola Hoffman, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. Lewis E. HECKEL, Defendant. Lewis E. HECKEL and Gertrude M. Heckel, his Wife, Plaintiffs, v. Chester A. JOHNSON as Building Inspector of the Borough of Mountainside, Union County, et al. and Daniel C

Attorney: [6] Mr. A. Albert Eichler, attorney for Daniel and Ollie Cahill, Betty Lou and Joseph Stypa, and Jola and Elias Hoffman (Mr. David M. Hoffman, appearing).

Case Date: Friday February 26, 1965

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

208 A.2d 651 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1965), C--143, Cahill v. Heckel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 93 Cal.App. 277, Civ. 3496, City of Stockton v. Frisbie & Latta
California - 64 Cal.App.2d 794, 12650, City of San Mateo v. Hardy
California - 88 Cal.App.2d 386, 16061, Donovan v. City of Santa Monica
California - __ Cal.App.2d __, Civ. 18180, Donovan v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County
Idaho - 117 P.2d 461 (Idaho 1941), 6833, City of Idaho Falls v. Grimmett

See all quotations