206 S.E.2d 875 (S.C. 1974), 19842, Knight v. Salisbury

Citation: 206 S.E.2d 875, 262 S.C. 565

Opinion Judge: LITTLEJOHN, Justice:

Party Name: Everett A. KNIGHT, Individually, and representing all other taxpayers and property owners within Lower Dorchester Recreation District, Respondent, v. Tommy J. SALISBURY et al., Appellants.

Attorney: Karren LeCraft Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Columbia, for Appellant, Daniel R. McLeod, as Attorney General, cites: As to Section 7 of Article VIII of the South Carolina Constitution not eliminating the necessity for the creation of special purpose districts relating to recreational facilities ...

Case Date: June 17, 1974

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

206 S.E.2d 875 (S.C. 1974), 19842, Knight v. Salisbury

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 135 S.E. 538 (S.C. 1926), 12084, Evans v. Beattie
South Carolina - 148 S.E. 726 (S.C. 1929), 12682, Shelor v. Pace
South Carolina - 188 S.E. 134 (S.C. 1936), 14364, State v. Hood
South Carolina - 39 S.E. 810 (S.C. 1901), Bray v. City Council of Florence
South Carolina - 103 S.E.2d 14 (S.C. 1957), 17312, Mills Mill v. Hawkins

See all quotations