205 Cal.App.3d 1510, A040750, Lopez v. McMahon

Citation: 205 Cal.App.3d 1510, 253 Cal.Rptr. 321

Opinion Judge: [11] Racanelli

Party Name: Lopez v. McMahon

Attorney: [7] Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, James Maidson and Kathryn Doi for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Wynne S. Carvill, Jo Ann Woodsum, Nina M. Brooks and Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. [9] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Chareton G. Ho...

Case Date: November 22, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

205 Cal.App.3d 1510, A040750, Lopez v. McMahon

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 631 F.Supp. 1331 (E.D.N.Y. 1986), 84 Civ. 4189, Furst v. New York City Transit Authority
Federal Cases - 489 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1973), 73-1415, Thompson v. Gallagher
Federal Cases - 381 F.Supp. 573 (S.D.Iowa 1974), Civ. 72-77-2, Butts v. Nichols
Federal Cases - 502 F.Supp. 1108 (N.D.Cal. 1980), C-78-2982, Kindem v. City of Alameda
Federal Cases - 397 U.S. 471 (1970), 131, Dandridge v. Williams

See all quotations