205 Cal.App.3d 1004, B024536, Raisola v. Flower Street Ltd.

Citation: 205 Cal.App.3d 1004, 252 Cal.Rptr. 726

Opinion Judge: [10] Ashby

Party Name: Raisola v. Flower Street Ltd.

Attorney: [7] Greenberg & Panish and Gary Kaplan for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Wise, Wiezorek, Timmons & Wise and Duane H. Timmons for Defendants and Respondents and for Intervener and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday November 04, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

205 Cal.App.3d 1004, B024536, Raisola v. Flower Street Ltd.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 15 Cal.3d 162, 23146, Quinn v. State of California
California - 129 Cal.App.2d 268, 15979, Quisenberry v. Rulison
California - 133 Cal.App.3d 764, 48648, Walsh v. Woods
California - 144 Cal.App.3d 309, 51403, Quinn v. Warnes
California - 181 Cal.App.3d 213, A022404, Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley

See all quotations