204 Cal.App.3d 671, B028195, M. C. & D. Capital Corp. v. Gilmaker

Citation: 204 Cal.App.3d 671, 251 Cal.Rptr. 178

Opinion Judge: [10] Arabian

Party Name: M. C. & D. Capital Corp. v. Gilmaker

Attorney: [7] Robert W. Peinado, Grant & Popovich and Irvin Grant for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Cottle & Keen, Matsuk & Orr and Edwin P. Martin for Defendants and Appellants.

Case Date: Wednesday September 07, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

204 Cal.App.3d 671, B028195, M. C. & D. Capital Corp. v. Gilmaker

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 165 Cal. 469, L. A. 3091, Fay v. Fay
California - 33 Cal.3d 778, 31691, Christensen v. Dewor Developments
California - 110 Cal.App. 452, Civ. 7432, Murphy v. F. D. Cornell Co. (a Corp.)
California - 49 Cal.App. 353, Civ. 3510, City Investment Co. v. Pringle
California - 70 Cal.App. 732, 4806, Brown v. Superior Court of California in and for Los Angeles County

See all quotations