202 Cal.App.3d 966, A031798, Wightman v. Franchise Tax Board

Citation: 202 Cal.App.3d 966, 249 Cal.Rptr. 207

Opinion Judge: [11] White

Party Name: Wightman v. Franchise Tax Board

Attorney: [7] Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, Barry L. Bunshoft, Patricia Shuler Shimbor, Vito C. Peraino, and Ray L. Wong for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, and Mary C. Michel, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respo...

Case Date: Tuesday July 12, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

202 Cal.App.3d 966, A031798, Wightman v. Franchise Tax Board

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites