202 Cal.App.3d 447, D005340, Whorton v. Dillingham

Citation: 202 Cal.App.3d 447, 248 Cal.Rptr. 405

Opinion Judge: [10] Work

Party Name: Whorton v. Dillingham

Attorney: [7] Hendrix & Aller, Daniel A. Martorella, Norman P. Spevack and Jan Stiglitz for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Barwick & Knowlton, Robert W. Knowlton, Timothy C. Rutherford, Rushall, McGeever & Sappington and Eileen L. McGeever for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: June 23, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

202 Cal.App.3d 447, D005340, Whorton v. Dillingham

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 18 Cal.3d 660, 30520, Marvin v. Marvin
California - 128 Cal.App.2d 380, 8364, Cline v. Festersen
California - 106 Cal.App.3d 64, 44980, Noguera v. North Monterey County Unified Sch. Dist.
California - 119 Cal.App.3d 343, 57194, Estate of Fincher
California - 122 Cal.App.3d 500, 60296, Jones v. Daly

See all quotations