202 Cal.App.3d 296, A038922, Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino

Citation: 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 248 Cal.Rptr. 352

Opinion Judge: [12] Newsom

Party Name: Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino

Attorney: [7] Luke & Perry, Leslie R. Perry and Jan L. Turner for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Remy & Thomas and Sharon E. Duggan as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. [9] H. Peter Klein, County Counsel, and Yves A. Hebert, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents. [10] Richar...

Case Date: Wednesday June 22, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

202 Cal.App.3d 296, A038922, Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 11 Cal.3d 506, 30139, Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles
California - 13 Cal.3d 263, 30307, Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com.
California - 13 Cal.3d 68, 30268, No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
California - 42 Cal.3d 929, 32144, Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 3 Dist. Agricultural Assn.
California - 8 Cal.3d 247, 7924, Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors

See all quotations