[2019] 1 WLR 2956

Core Citations

REPORTS OPINION

• R Tony Michael Jimenez v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• R KBR Inc. v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office
• R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle (on behalf of Pro-Life Alliance)
• Dorset County Council v David Richard Yeates House
• Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Development Company v Al Refai



See all quotations

• R Tony Michael Jimenez v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (First Respondent) HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs (Second Respondent)
• Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL and Others (No.4)
• SSL International Plc and Another (Claimants/Appellants) v TTK Lig Ltd and Others
• R (on the application of Derrin Brothers Properties Ltd and Others) v A Judge of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others
• Langham v Veltema
• R (on the application of Davies and another) v HM Revenue and Customs
• Re Sawers, ex parte Blain
• Clavis Liberty Fund LP1 (acting through Cowen) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners and Others
• Colquhoun v Brooks
• Revenue and Customs Comrs v Romie Tager QC (Personal Representative of Osias Tager deceased)
• Bloomsbury International Ltd & Others v Sea Fish Industry Authority & Anothers
• Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria)
• R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence
• Bilta (UK) Ltd (in Liquidation) v Nazir
• Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry
• R (Smith) v Oxfordshire Assistant Deputy Coroner
• Agassi v Robinson (Inspector of Taxes)
• R PML Accounting Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
• Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC
• Council Directive of 19 December 1977 concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the fields of direct taxation and value added tax (77/799/EEC)
• R v Hape,