200 S.E. 393 (N.C. 1939), 687, Oldham v. Ross

Citation: 200 S.E. 393, 214 N.C. 696

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: OLDHAM v. ROSS et al.

Attorney: W. Henry Hunter and Harry Rockwell, both of Greensboro, for appellant. Douglas & Douglas, T. J. Hill, and York & Boyd, all of Greensboro, for appellees.

Case Date: Wednesday January 04, 1939

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

200 S.E. 393 (N.C. 1939), 687, Oldham v. Ross

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 105 S.E. 889 (N.C. 1921), 61, Churchwell v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
North Carolina - 129 S.E. 419 (N.C. 1925), 64, Pridgen v. Pridgen
North Carolina - 139 S.E. 689 (N.C. 1927), 106, Barnes v. People's Bank & Trust Co.
North Carolina - 174 S.E. 451 (N.C. 1934), 510, Dix-Downing v. White
North Carolina - 81 S.E. 291 (N.C. 1914), Alston v. Hill