200 N.E.2d 318 (Ohio 1964), 38558, Fortelka v. Meifert

Citation: 200 N.E.2d 318, 176 Ohio St. 476

Opinion Judge: GRIFFITH, J.

Party Name: FORTELKA, Appellee, v. MEIFERT, Admx., Appellant.

Attorney: John M. Drain, Cleveland, for appellee. Mr. John M. Drain, for appellee. Messrs. Davis & Young, for appellant.

Judge Panel: TAFT, C. J., and MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Case Date: July 08, 1964

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Extract

200 N.E.2d 318 (Ohio 1964), 38558, Fortelka v. Meifert

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 199 N.E. 353 (Ohio 1936), 25598, Executors and administrators Presentation of claims by creditors Sections 10509112 and 10509134, General Code Owner of promissory note not required to present claim Fiduciary in possession of note for collection The provisions of Sections 10509112 and 10509134, General Code 114 Ohio Laws, 320), 25598, do not require the owner of a promissory note to present his claim thereunder to an executor or administrator when the executor or administrator at the time of his appointment is already in possession of the note for collection, Gerhold v. Papathanasion
Ohio - 3 N.E.2d 417 (Ohio 1936), 25747, Beach v. Mizner
Ohio - 56 N.E.2d 168 (Ohio 1944), 29885, Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Joyce Bldg. Realty Co.
Ohio - 64 N.E.2d 845 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1945), Benson v. Rosine
Ohio - 15 Ohio St. 15 (Ohio 1864), Cheeseman v. Kyle