200 Cal.App.3d 1188, D005373, Jaffe v. Huxley Architecture

Citation: 200 Cal.App.3d 1188, 246 Cal.Rptr. 432

Opinion Judge: [10] Benke

Party Name: Jaffe v. Huxley Architecture

Attorney: [7] MacDonald, Halsted & Laybourne, Thomas M. Shoesmith, Cecelia R. Wolfe, Higgs, Fletcher & Mack and Kenneth D. Huston for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] William D. Hughes, Raymond W. Noonan and Hughes & Campbell for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Friday April 29, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

200 Cal.App.3d 1188, D005373, Jaffe v. Huxley Architecture

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 34 Cal. 48, Maynard v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
California - 49 Cal.2d 764, 19329, Signal Oil Etc. Co. v. Ashland Oil Etc. Co.
California - 13 Cal.3d 804, 30277, Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
California - 20 Cal.3d 578, 30737, American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court
California - 38 Cal.3d 488, 31826, Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates

See all quotations