20 Cal.App.4th 1441, B073188, Wilson v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Citation: 20 Cal.App.4th 1441, 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 282

Opinion Judge: [10] Ortega

Party Name: Wilson v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Attorney: [7] Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Edmond B. Mamer and Jack T. Kerry, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Staker & Gose and Gose, Panitz & Lechman and Philip Garrett Panitz for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Case Date: Monday December 13, 1993

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

20 Cal.App.4th 1441, B073188, Wilson v. Franchise Tax Bd.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 690 F.2d 40 (2nd Cir. 1982), 1206, Stemkowski v. C. I. R.
California - 169 Cal.App.3d 1088, B008118, American Hospital Supply Corp. v. State Bd. of Equalization
California - 204 Cal.App.3d 1269, D005707, Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. State Bd. of Equalization
California - 208 Cal.App.3d 972, B032783, Newman v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California - 220 Cal.App.3d 889, B041706, Mole-Richardson Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd.

See all quotations