2 S.E.2d 907 (Ga. 1939), 12748, Dudley v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Citation: 2 S.E.2d 907, 188 Ga. 91

Opinion Judge: DUCKWORTH, Justice.

Party Name: DUDLEY et al. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.

Attorney: A provision in a security deed that 'It is agreed and understood that this deed shall secure not only the above-described indebtedness but any renewals or extensions of said indebtedness or any other indebtedness which I may owe to said bank, either as maker or endorser, during the next five year...

Case Date: Tuesday May 09, 1939

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

2 S.E.2d 907 (Ga. 1939), 12748, Dudley v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 101 S.E. 769 (Ga. 1920), 1349, Washington Exch. Bank v. Smith
Georgia - 148 S.E. 418 (Ga.App. 1929), 19284, Mandeville Mills v. Milam
Georgia - 87 S.E. 759 (Ga.App. 1916), 6622, Skinner v. Elliott
Georgia - 2 S.E.2d 909 (Ga. 1939), 12756, Western Union Telegraph Co. v. King