198 Cal.App.3d 591, A037782, Richard H. v. Larry D.

Citation: 198 Cal.App.3d 591, 243 Cal.Rptr. 807

Opinion Judge: [10] Haning

Party Name: Richard H. v. Larry D.

Attorney: [7] Philip Borowsky and Cartwright, Slobodin, Bokelman, Borowsky, Wartnick, Moore & Harris for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Susan M. Schmidt, Robert D. Huber, Hassard, Bonnington, Rogers & Huber, John L. Supple, William E. Grayson and La Follette, Johnson, DeHaas & Fesler for Defendants and Respo...

Case Date: February 11, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

198 Cal.App.3d 591, A037782, Richard H. v. Larry D.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 46 Cal.2d 601, 23808, Langley v. Schumacker
California - 62 Cal.2d 154, 21771, Quintal v. Laurel Grove Hospital
California - 68 Cal.2d 728, 7816, Dillon v. Legg
California - 15 Cal.3d 40, 30452, Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.
California - 27 Cal.3d 916, 24084, Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

See all quotations