198 Cal.App.3d 332, D005452, In re Marriage of Helsel

Citation: 198 Cal.App.3d 332, 243 Cal.Rptr. 657

Opinion Judge: [10] Wiener

Party Name: In re Marriage of Helsel

Attorney: [7] William A. Newman III and Cyril Lawrence for Respondent and Appellant. [8] Richard D. Ring and Ring & Cline for Petitioner and Respondent.

Case Date: Friday February 05, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

198 Cal.App.3d 332, D005452, In re Marriage of Helsel

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 792 F.2d 387 (3rd Cir. 1986), 85-3312, Edwards v. Born, Inc.
California - 70 Cal.2d 272, 29404, Linsk v. Linsk
California - 38 Cal.3d 396, 31823, Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.
California - 192 Cal.App.2d 145, 9885, Nahhas v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
California - 206 Cal.App.2d 780, 25952, Duffy v. Griffith Co.

See all quotations