197 Cal.App.3d 1037, A034137, Pitman v. City of Oakland

Citation: 197 Cal.App.3d 1037, 243 Cal.Rptr. 306

Opinion Judge: [10] Benson

Party Name: Pitman v. City of Oakland

Attorney: [7] Vincent A. Harrington, Jr., and Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard G. Tullis, Deputy Attorney General, Richard E. Winnie, City Attorney, and Mark B. Shragge for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday January 21, 1988

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

197 Cal.App.3d 1037, A034137, Pitman v. City of Oakland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 13 Cal.3d 757, 30348, White v. Davis
California - 24 Cal.3d 836, 23823, California Mfrs. Assn. v. Public Utilities Com.
California - 25 Cal.3d 932, 23890, Agarwal v. Johnson
California - 32 Cal.3d 535, 31548, Moore v. Panish
California - 145 Cal.App.3d 540, AO22049, In re Fain

See all quotations