193 N.W. 312 (N.D. 1923), Stoskoff v. Wicklund

Citation: 193 N.W. 312, 49 N.D. 708

Opinion Judge: NUESSLE, J.

Party Name: GEORGE STOSKOFF, Respondent, v. CARL A. WICKLUND, Appellant

Attorney: Bosard & Twiford and Craven & Converse, for appellant. Frank E. Fisk and Fisk, Murphy & Nash, for respondent.

Judge Panel: NUESSLE, J. BIRDZELL, CHRISTIANSON, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur, BRONSON, Ch. J. (specially concurring). We must reverse the judgment for the reason as stated. Although defendant is not entitled to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, he is entitled to a new trial. Judgment reversed and new trial...

Case Date: April 17, 1923

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court