193 Cal.App.2d 96, 19098, McCormack v. City and County of San Francisco

Citation: 193 Cal.App.2d 96, 14 Cal.Rptr. 79

Opinion Judge: [10] Kaufman

Party Name: McCormack v. City and County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and George P. Agnost, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant. [8] Hoberg, Finger, Brown & Abramson for Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday June 15, 1961

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

193 Cal.App.2d 96, 19098, McCormack v. City and County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 150 Cal. 741, L. A. 1638, Kline v. Santa Barbara Consolidated Railway Company
California - 42 Cal.2d 682, 22868, Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.
California - 113 Cal.App. 561, Civ. 7589, Davis v. Renton
California - 131 Cal.App. 258, Civ. 8821, Marshall v. Smith
California - 146 Cal.App.2d 216, 16886, Mcmillen v. Southern Pac. Co.

See all quotations