193 Cal.App.2d 543, 19744, Smith v. Madruga

Citation: 193 Cal.App.2d 543, 14 Cal.Rptr. 389

Opinion Judge: [10] Hoyt

Party Name: Smith v. Madruga

Attorney: [7] Reaves & Watson and Francis A. Watson, Jr., for Appellant. [8] John A. Nejedly, District Attorney, and Charles R. Mack, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

Case Date: Monday July 03, 1961

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

193 Cal.App.2d 543, 19744, Smith v. Madruga

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 134 Cal. 103, L. A. 817, Miller v. Fano
California - 218 Cal. 425, L. A. 14012, Abbott v. Cooper
California - 16 Cal.2d 744, 17016, Dept. of Water & Power v. Inyo Chem. Co.
California - 29 Cal.2d 34, 17196, Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters
California - 36 Cal.2d 426, 20946, Carruth v. Fritch

See all quotations