193 Cal.App.2d 233, 19636, Richards v. Flower

Citation: 193 Cal.App.2d 233, 14 Cal.Rptr. 228

Opinion Judge: [11] Shoemaker

Party Name: Richards v. Flower

Attorney: [7] George King for Appellants. [8] William H. Coburn, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent. [9] Dinkelspiel & Dinkelspiel and Norman Coliver for Interveners and Respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday June 21, 1961

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

193 Cal.App.2d 233, 19636, Richards v. Flower

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 17 Cal.2d 280, 16357, Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal
California - 21 Cal.2d 343, 16337, Estate of Platt
California - 23 Cal.2d 120, 18316, Estate of Hanley
California - 46 Cal.2d 423, 23225, Continental Cas. Co. v. Phoenix Constr. Co.
California - 167 Cal.App.2d 403, 18335, Vogel v. City of Millbrae

See all quotations