192 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. 1972), 27308, Yeomans v. State

Citation: 192 S.E.2d 362, 229 Ga. 488

Opinion Judge: MOBLEY, Chief Justice.

Party Name: Jackie YEOMANS v. The STATE.

Attorney: question of whether he was an accomplice, or in failing to charge them on the necessity for corroboration of the testimony of an accomplice., J. S. Hutto & Associates, J. S. Hutto, Brunswick, for appellant., Glenn Thomas, Jr., Dist. Atty., Jesup, William Wayne Williams, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Br...

Case Date: Thursday September 07, 1972

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

192 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. 1972), 27308, Yeomans v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 390 U.S. 570 (1968), 85, United States v. Jackson
Georgia - 25 S.E. 182 (Ga. 1895), Duncan v. State
Georgia - 45 S.E. 58 (Ga. 1903), Hargrove v. State
Georgia - 105 S.E.2d 748 (Ga.App. 1958), 37342, Marshall v. State
Georgia - 173 S.E.2d 412 (Ga.App. 1970), 45062, Johnson v. State

See all quotations