192 Cal.App.3d 568, B015047, Maupin v. Widling

Citation: 192 Cal.App.3d 568, 237 Cal.Rptr. 521

Opinion Judge: [10] Gilbert

Party Name: Maupin v. Widling

Attorney: [7] Frazier, Dame & Doherty, Frazier, Doherty, Jennings & Neuhaus and Peter J. Groom for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Zajic & Lauritsen and Christopher J. Zajic for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: June 09, 1987

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

192 Cal.App.3d 568, B015047, Maupin v. Widling

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 26 Cal.2d 213, 19154, Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.
California - 49 Cal.2d 652, 24631, Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.
California - 67 Cal.2d 185, 22505, Akins v. Sonoma County
California - 12 Cal.3d 663, 8000, Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.
California - 13 Cal.3d 349, 7981, Smith v. Lewis

See all quotations