191 N.E.2d 160 (Ohio 1963), 37621, Wrightesmith v. Public Utilities Commission

Citation: 191 N.E.2d 160, 174 Ohio St. 537

Opinion Judge: HERBERT, J.

Party Name: WRIGHTESMITH, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION of Ohio, Appellee.

Attorney: Herbert Baker and James R. Stiverson, Columbus, for appellant., William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., Andrew R. Sarisky and Jay C. Flowers, Columbus, for appellee., Porter, Stanley, Treffinger & Platt and Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, for Columbus Retail Merchants Delivery, Inc. Mr. Herbert B...

Judge Panel: TAFT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, J., dissent. ZIMMERMAN, Judge (dissenting).

Case Date: May 22, 1963

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

191 N.E.2d 160 (Ohio 1963), 37621, Wrightesmith v. Public Utilities Commission

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 143 N.E. 381 (Ohio 1924), 18331, Mclain v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio - 155 N.E. 694 (Ohio 1927), 20109, 20110, 20111, 20112, 20113, 20114, 20115, 20116, and 20028, Penn. Rd. Co. v. Util. Comm.
Ohio - 183 N.E. 782 (Ohio 1932), 23615, Col. Motor Express v. P. U. C.
Ohio - 19 N.E.2d 956 (Ohio 1939), 27258-27263, H. & K. Motor Transp. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Ohio - 40 N.E.2d 666 (Ohio 1942), 28823, Bray v. Public Utilities Commission

See all quotations