191 F.R.D. 398 (D.N.J. 1999), Civ. A. 98-5764 (AJL), Rowe v. Dean Witter

Citation: 191 F.R.D. 398

Opinion Judge: LECHNER, District Judge.

Party Name: Margaret A. ROWE, Peter, Rowe, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER, and Thomas Mullooly, Defendants.

Attorney: Richard M. Fricke, Fricke & Solomon, P.C., Newark, NJ, for Plaintiffs. David J. Libowsky, Brian F. Amery, Bressler, Amery, & Ross, P.C., Morristown, NJ, for Defendants.

Case Date: December 20, 1999

Court: U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

191 F.R.D. 398 (D.N.J. 1999), Civ. A. 98-5764 (AJL), Rowe v. Dean Witter

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 1 "Maritime Transactions" and "Commerce" Defined; Exceptions to Operation of Title
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 3 Stay of Proceedings Where Issue Therein Referable to Arbitration
US Code - 9 U.S.C. § 4 Failure to Arbitrate Under Agreement; Petition to United States Court Having Jurisdiction For Order to Compel Arbitration; Notice and Service Thereof; Hearing and Determination
US Code - 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Federal Cases - Harsco Corp. v. Segui

See all quotations