19 Cal.App.4th 1837, A055835, Urbaniak v. Newton

Citation: 19 Cal.App.4th 1837, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 333

Opinion Judge: [10] Dossee

Party Name: Urbaniak v. Newton

Attorney: [7] O'Connor, Cohn, Dillon & Barr, Duncan Barr, Susan Reifel, Paul N. Halvonik, Fred J. Hiestand, Lynch, Loofbourrow, Helmenstine, Gilardi & Grummer, Daniel F. McLennon and Robert T. Lynch for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Bien, Summers & Dale, Richard R. Dale and Elliot L. Bien for Plaintiff an...

Case Date: Friday November 12, 1993

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

19 Cal.App.4th 1837, A055835, Urbaniak v. Newton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 482 U.S. 755 (1987), 85-1630, Hewitt v. Helms
California - 32 Cal.3d 668, 24326, Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of Governments
California - 43 Cal.3d 1281, 32086, Maria P. v. Riles
California - 146 Cal.App.3d 959, 26678, Presley of Southern California v. Whelan
California - 176 Cal.App.3d 454, 24371, Miller v. California Com. On Status of Women

See all quotations