19 Cal.App.4th 122, A059534, Bennett v. McCall

Citation: 19 Cal.App.4th 122, 23 Cal.Rptr.2d 268

Opinion Judge: [10] Haning

Party Name: Bennett v. McCall

Attorney: [7] Law Office of Walter S. Moeller, Walter S. Moeller and William S. Caspari, Alameda, California for Appellant. [8] Boughey, Garvie & Bushner, Ronald S. Bushner and Charlotte F. Ruben, San Francisco, California for Respondents.

Case Date: Monday October 04, 1993

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

19 Cal.App.4th 122, A059534, Bennett v. McCall

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 31 Cal.3d 362, 31474, Lipson v. Superior Court
California - 6 Cal.3d 195, 29870, Budd v. Nixen
California - 2 Cal.4th 606, S021074, Laird v. Blacker
California - 137 Cal.App.3d 328, 63438, Gurkewitz v. Haberman
California - 197 Cal.App.3d 1032, A032906, Buckhart v. San Francisco Residential Rent etc., Bd.

See all quotations