19 Cal.3d 35, 23494, Nipper v. California Auto. Assigned Risk Plan

Citation: 19 Cal.3d 35, 136 Cal.Rptr. 854, 560 P.2d 743

Opinion Judge: [11] Richardson

Party Name: Nipper v. California Auto. Assigned Risk Plan

Attorney: [7] McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Coyle & Wayte, Stephen R. Cornwell and James P. Wagoner for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Bagley, Bianchi, Hoskins & Rosenberg, Bianchi, Hoskins & Rosenberg, Albert Bianchi, Peter C. Morris and Stutsman & Nagel for Defendants and Respondents. [9] Peter W. Fisher, ...

Case Date: Monday February 28, 1977

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

19 Cal.3d 35, 23494, Nipper v. California Auto. Assigned Risk Plan

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 30 Cal.2d 463, 19663, Mudd v. McColgan
California - 56 Cal.2d 596, 20690, Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.
California - 58 Cal.2d 142, 26328, Interinsurance Exchange of Auto. Club of Southern Cal. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.
California - 69 Cal.2d 850, 28698, Connor v. Great Western Sav. & Loan Ass'n
California - 71 Cal.2d 659, 22313, Barrera v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

See all quotations