188 S.E.2d 188 (S.C. 1972), 19395, Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Copeland

Citation: 188 S.E.2d 188, 258 S.C. 206

Opinion Judge: LITTLEJOHN, Justice.

Party Name: CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appellant-Respondent, v. Frank P. COPELAND, Jr., and The Federal Land Bank of Columbia of whom thefirst named is, Respondent-Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. James P. Mozingo, III, Baker & Etheridge, and Paulling & James, of Darlington, for Appellant-Respondent, cite: As to lack of proof on which the jury could base a finding that it was reasonably probable that the land involved would be put to use as residential subdivision property within t...

Case Date: Tuesday March 28, 1972

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

188 S.E.2d 188 (S.C. 1972), 19395, Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Copeland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 112 S.E. 55 (S.C. 1922), 10850, Haig v. Wateree Power Co.
South Carolina - 117 S.E.2d 561 (S.C. 1960), 17723, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Miller
South Carolina - 121 S.E.2d 236 (S.C. 1961), 17816, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Southern Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 131 S.E.2d 257 (S.C. 1963), 18071, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Sharpe
South Carolina - 131 S.E.2d 44 (S.C. 1963), 18067, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Schrimpf

See all quotations