188 Cal.App.3d 828, A031452, Tokin Construction Co. v. County of Humboldt

Citation: 188 Cal.App.3d 828, 233 Cal.Rptr. 587

Opinion Judge: [10] Merrill

Party Name: Tokin Construction Co. v. County of Humboldt

Attorney: [7] Robert D. Curiel, County Counsel, and William J. Losh, Jr., Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Francis B. Mathews and Mathews & Mathews for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday January 13, 1987

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

188 Cal.App.3d 828, A031452, Tokin Construction Co. v. County of Humboldt

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 273 U.S. 326 (1927), 51, Sacramento Navigation Company v. Salz
California - 57 Cal.2d 508, 20919, Souza & McCue Const. Co. v. Superior Court of San Benito County
California - 65 Cal.2d 777, 28983, Wunderlich v. State ex rel. Department of Public Works
California - 65 Cal.2d 787, 22412, E. H. Morrill Co. v. State
California - 2 Cal.3d 285, 29653, Warner Constr. Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations