188 Cal.App.3d 1375, A014980, City and County of San Francisco v. Ragland

Citation: 188 Cal.App.3d 1375, 234 Cal.Rptr. 327

Opinion Judge: [11] Anderson

Party Name: City and County of San Francisco v. Ragland

Attorney: [7] Donald E. Hanson for Defendant and Appellant. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gloria F. De Hart, Linda Ludlow, Stan M. Helfman and Mary A. Roth, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiffs and Respondents. [9] William A. Richmond, Distric...

Case Date: Wednesday January 28, 1987

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

188 Cal.App.3d 1375, A014980, City and County of San Francisco v. Ragland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 46 Cal.2d 868, 24014, Lefave v. Dimond
California - 22 Cal.3d 1, 30773, Davis v. Air Technical Industries, Inc.
California - 24 Cal.3d 22, 30971, Salas v. Cortez
California - 100 Cal.App.3d 535, 21471, D. G. v. Superior Court
California - 102 Cal.App.3d 926, 57865, County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

See all quotations