187 S.E. 921 (S.C. 1936), 14358, Bomar v. City of Spartanburg

Citation: 187 S.E. 921, 181 S.C. 453

Opinion Judge: BONHAM, Justice.

Party Name: BOMAR v. CITY OF SPARTANBURG. PENNELL & HARLEY, Inc., v. CHEMICAL NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. et al.

Attorney: Odom & Bostick and Esten C. Taylor, all of Spartanburg, for appellant. Perrin & Tinsley and Horace L. Bomar, all of Spartanburg, for respondent.

Judge Panel: CARTER, J., did not participate.

Case Date: Friday October 09, 1936

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

187 S.E. 921 (S.C. 1936), 14358, Bomar v. City of Spartanburg

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 12 S.C. 488 (S.C. 1879), 765, Annely v. De Saussure
South Carolina - 3 S.C. 333 (S.C. 1872), Smith v. Gatewood
South Carolina - 1 S.E. 25 (S.C. 1886), Lowry v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund (State Report Title: Lowry v. Thompson)
South Carolina - 137 S.E. 211 (S.C. 1927), 12176, Columbia Gaslight Co. v. Mobley
South Carolina - 151 S.E. 887 (S.C. 1930), 12842, U.S. Cas. Co. v. State Highway Dept. of South Carolina

See all quotations