187 S.E.2d 135 (Ga. 1972), 26865, Hughes v. State

Citation: 187 S.E.2d 135, 228 Ga. 593

Opinion Judge: ALMAND, Chief Justice.

Party Name: Pressie HUGHES v. The STATE.

Attorney: 2. There is no showing that any of appellant's various defense counsel were incompetent to advise him or to represent him, and the fact that he consistently refused to accept their advice does not render their assistance ineffective., Hester & Hester, Frank B. Hester, Richard M. Hester, Atlanta, ...

Case Date: Wednesday January 19, 1972

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

187 S.E.2d 135 (Ga. 1972), 26865, Hughes v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 416 F.2d 194 (5th Cir. 1969), 25932, Sanders v. United States
Georgia - 21 S.E. 132 (Ga. 1894), Roberts v. State
Georgia - 168 S.E.2d 133 (Ga. 1969), 25147, Sullivan v. State
Georgia - 172 S.E.2d 684 (Ga. 1970), 25581, Neal v. Smith
Georgia - 182 S.E.2d 101 (Ga. 1971), 26484, Johnson v. Smith

See all quotations