187 Cal.App.3d 639, B018129, Tirpak v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

Citation: 187 Cal.App.3d 639, 232 Cal.Rptr. 61

Opinion Judge: [10] Eagleson

Party Name: Tirpak v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

Attorney: [7] Newman, Aaronson, Krekorian, Vanaman and Valerie Vanaman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] La Follette, Johnson, Schroeter & DeHaas, La Follette, Johnson, DeHaas & Fesler and Dennis R. Spirgen for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: December 01, 1986

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

187 Cal.App.3d 639, B018129, Tirpak v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 2 Cal.3d 741, 29737, Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist.
California - 22 Cal.3d 508, 30857, Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist.
California - 27 Cal.3d 741, 24006, Thompson v. County of Alameda
California - 33 Cal.3d 301, 31391, John A. v. San Bernardino City Unified School Dist.
California - 36 Cal.3d 799, 24587, Peterson v. San Francisco Community College Dist.

See all quotations