186 S.E. 786 (S.C. 1936), 14332, Lusk v. State Highway Dept.

Citation: 186 S.E. 786, 181 S.C. 101

Opinion Judge: BAKER, Justice.

Party Name: LUSK v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. MONROE v. SAME.

Attorney: John M. Daniel, Atty. Gen., and J. Ivey Humphrey and M. J. Hough, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Blythe & Bonham, of Greenville, for appellant. J. Robert Martin, of Greenville, for respondents.

Judge Panel: CARTER, J., did not participate in this decision.

Case Date: Tuesday July 14, 1936

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

186 S.E. 786 (S.C. 1936), 14332, Lusk v. State Highway Dept.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 109 S.E. 119 (S.C. 1921), 10732, State v. Turner
South Carolina - 112 S.E. 78 (S.C. 1922), 10860, Powers v. Rawles
South Carolina - 113 S.E. 632 (S.C. 1922), 10995, Morris v. Mills
South Carolina - 122 S.E. 856 (S.C. 1924), 11499, State v. Barfield
South Carolina - 132 S.E. 811 (S.C. 1926), 11960, Sumter Trust Co. v. Holman

See all quotations