186 N.W. 610 (Wis. 1922), Heintz v. Schenck

Citation: 186 N.W. 610, 176 Wis. 562

Opinion Judge: MARVIN B. ROSENBERRY, J.

Party Name: HEINTZ, Respondent, v. SCHENCK, Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief signed by Glicksman, Gold & Corrigan, and oral argument by Walter D. Corrigan and Robert Wild, all of Milwaukee. For the respondent there was a brief by Dale C. Shockley, attorney, and Edgar P. Ettenheim and L. A. Schweichler, of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and ...

Case Date: February 07, 1922

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court