186 Cal.App.2d 524, 19557, Holt v. Superior Court In and For San Mateo County

Citation: 186 Cal.App.2d 524, 9 Cal.Rptr. 353

Opinion Judge: [10] Shoemaker

Party Name: Holt v. Superior Court In and For San Mateo County

Attorney: [7] Sullivan, Roche, Johnson & Farraher and Daniel H. Dibert for Petitioner. [8] Keith C. Sorenson, District Attorney, and Lyle R. Edson, Chief Civil Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent and Real Parties in Interest.

Case Date: Monday November 21, 1960

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

186 Cal.App.2d 524, 19557, Holt v. Superior Court In and For San Mateo County

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 47 Cal.2d 25, 5935, In re Florance
California - 78 Cal.App. 23, Civ. 5177, In re Hill
California - 34 Cal.App.2d 77, 2077, In re Jones
California - 85 Cal.App.2d 219, 3654, In re Halamuda