186 A.2d 679 (N.J. 1962), A--48, Hoagland v. Springer
Citation:
186 A.2d 679, 39 N.J. 32
Opinion Judge:
[10] Per Curiam
Party Name:
Elmer T. HOAGLAND, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William C. SPRINGER, Defendant-Respondent, and Cummins Engine Company, Inc., a corporation of the State of Indiana, Cummins Diesel Metropolitan, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendants, and Cummins Diesel Michigan, Inc., a corporation of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellant.
Attorney:
[6] Mr. Herman D. Michels argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. John E. Morris, on the brief; Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, attorneys).
