185 S.E.2d 53 (Ga. 1971), 26633, Depalma v. State

Citation: 185 S.E.2d 53, 228 Ga. 272

Opinion Judge: MOBLEY, Presiding Justice.

Party Name: J. D. DePALMA v. The STATE.

Attorney: was not wholly circumstantial, a charge on circumstantial evidence was not required., (b) In the process of effecting a lawful search for burglary tools and narcotics, the officers could seize property which they had reasonable cause to believe was stolen. (c) The search was not such a general se...

Case Date: Friday November 05, 1971

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

185 S.E.2d 53 (Ga. 1971), 26633, Depalma v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 379 U.S. 476 (1965), 40, Stanford v. Texas
Georgia - 56 S.E. 125 (Ga. 1906), Nobles v. State
Georgia - 121 S.E.2d 782 (Ga. 1961), 21292, Williamson v. State
Georgia - 148 S.E.2d 508 (Ga.App. 1966), 41845, Cain v. State
Georgia - 165 S.E.2d 302 (Ga. 1968), 24764, Strauss v. Stynchcombe

See all quotations