185 N.W. 225 (Wis. 1921), Hanson v. Temple

Citation: 185 N.W. 225, 175 Wis. 349

Opinion Judge: CHRISTIAN DOERFLER, J.

Party Name: HANSON, Respondent, v. TEMPLE and another, Appellants

Attorney: For the appellants the cause was submitted on the brief of McFarlane & Loomis of Mauston. For the respondent there was a brief by Frank H. Hanson in pro. per. and John B. Miller, attorney, both of Mauston, and oral argument by Mr. Hanson.

Case Date: Tuesday November 15, 1921

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court