184 S.E. 836 (N.C. 1936), 289, State v. Ray

Citation: 184 S.E. 836, 209 N.C. 772

Opinion Judge: SCHENCK, Justice.

Party Name: STATE v. RAY et al.

Attorney: Ellis Nassif and Douglass & Douglass, all of Raleigh, for appellant. A. A. F. Seawell, Atty. Gen., and Harry McMullan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Case Date: Wednesday April 08, 1936

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

184 S.E. 836 (N.C. 1936), 289, State v. Ray

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 82 N.C. 617 (N.C. 1880), State v. Outerbridge
North Carolina - 84 N.C. 742 (N.C. 1881), State v. Murphy
North Carolina - 9 N.C. 248 (N.C. 1822), State v. Twitty
North Carolina - 109 S.E. 1 (N.C. 1921), 346, State v. Pannil
North Carolina - 109 S.E. 27 (N.C. 1921), 349, State v. Lemons

See all quotations