184 N.E. 865 (Ill. 1933), 21230, Wright v. Loring

Citation: 184 N.E. 865, 351 Ill. 584

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: WRIGHT v. LORING.

Attorney: [351 Ill. 585] Acton, Acton & Baldwin, Rearick & Meeks, and Jones, McIntire & Jones, all of Danville, for plaintiff in error. Walter V. Dysert, Louis J. Bremer, Hall & Holaday, and Hutton & Clark, all of Danville (H. Ernest Hutton and Arthur R. Hall, both of Danville, of counsel), for defendant i...

Case Date: February 23, 1933

Court: Illinois Supreme Court