184 Cal.App.2d 523, 24525, Cottam v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 184 Cal.App.2d 523, 7 Cal.Rptr. 734

Opinion Judge: [10] Scott

Party Name: Cottam v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones and John J. Tully, Jr., Assistant City Attorneys, for Appellants. [8] Jones & Tollefson and Philip F. Jones for Respondent.

Case Date: Monday September 12, 1960

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

184 Cal.App.2d 523, 24525, Cottam v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 45 Cal.2d 872, 18989, Sefton v. Sefton
California - 46 Cal.2d 182, 19100, Eichelberger v. City of Berkeley
California - 126 Cal.App.2d 447, 20220, Malone v. City of Los Angeles
California - 24 Cal.App.2d 462, 11623, Price v. Price
California - 63 Cal.App.2d 38, 14279, Estate of Gosnell

See all quotations