183 S.E.2d 906 (S.C. 1971), 19293, State v. DeAngelis

Citation: 183 S.E.2d 906, 257 S.C. 44

Opinion Judge: LITTLEJOHN, Justice.

Party Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. James V. DeANGELIS, Appellant.

Attorney: Messrs. Patrick E. Treacy and Jack McGuinn, of Columbia, for Appellant, cite: As to the defense being prejudiced materially by the production of witness without notice to the defense, after the defense had requested a list of all witnesses at a preliminary hearing: 104 S.C. 353, 89 S.E. 153; 373 ...

Case Date: September 28, 1971

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

183 S.E.2d 906 (S.C. 1971), 19293, State v. DeAngelis

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 148 S.E. 66 (S.C. 1929), 12563, Harvie v. Heise
South Carolina - 79 S.E. 641 (S.C. 1913), City of Anderson v. Fant
South Carolina - 13 S.E.2d 630 (S.C. 1941), 15231, Alexander v. Hunnicutt
South Carolina - 182 S.E.2d 732 (S.C. 1971), 19252, State v. DeAngelis
South Carolina - 35 S.E.2d 835 (S.C. 1945), 15777, State v. Appley

See all quotations