182 S.E.2d 55 (S.C. 1971), 19240, Notios Corp. v. Hanvey

Citation: 182 S.E.2d 55, 256 S.C. 275

Opinion Judge: BUSSEY, Justice:

Party Name: NOTIOS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Samuel E. HANVEY, Respondent.

Attorney: Augustine T. Smythe, Esq., Buist, Buist, Smythe & Smythe, of Charleston, for Appellant, cites: As to a controversy of sufficient merit to justify application of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act: 1 S. C. L, Q. 58; 16 Am. Jur. 281--282; 176 Va. 201, 10 S.E.2d 593, 597; 249 S.C. 561, 155 S.E.2d...

Case Date: June 16, 1971

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

182 S.E.2d 55 (S.C. 1971), 19240, Notios Corp. v. Hanvey

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 115 S.E.2d 177 (S.C. 1960), 17665, Plenge v. Russell
South Carolina - 133 S.E.2d 71 (S.C. 1963), 18112, Hardwick v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 152 S.E.2d 676 (S.C. 1967), 18595, Bank of Augusta v. Satcher Motor Co.
South Carolina - 155 S.E.2d 618 (S.C. 1967), 18665, Guimarin & Doan, Inc. v. Georgetown Textile & Mfg. Co.
South Carolina - 182 S.E.2d 78 (S.C. 1971), 19241, Berry v. Lindsay

See all quotations