182 Cal.App.3d 967, B010792, Chauncey v. Niems

Citation: 182 Cal.App.3d 967, 227 Cal.Rptr. 718

Opinion Judge: [10] Hanson

Party Name: Chauncey v. Niems

Attorney: [7] Stuart E. Berman for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Norman Edell, in pro. per., Karen & Edell, Neiman, Billet, Albala & Levine and Patricia M. Wolfe for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday June 26, 1986

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

182 Cal.App.3d 967, B010792, Chauncey v. Niems

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 536 F.2d 838 (9th Cir. 1976), 74-1807, Von Brimer v. Whirlpool Corp.
California - 18 Cal.2d 146, 16539, Jaffe v. Stone
California - 46 Cal.2d 375, 23159, Albertson v. Raboff
California - 48 Cal.2d 577, 24292, Hardy v. Vial
California - 67 Cal.2d 695, 29439, Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.

See all quotations