182 A.2d 11 (Conn. 1962), Crouchley v. Pambianchi

Citation: 182 A.2d 11, 149 Conn. 512

Opinion Judge: ALCORN, J.

Party Name: Charles CROUCHLEY, Jr., et al. v. Leo J. PAMBIANCHI et al.

Attorney: Philip H. Smith, Bridgeport, for appellants (plaintiffs)., J. Harold Merrick, Ridgefield, for appellee (named defendant)., Louis Weinstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, was Albert L. Coles, Atty. Gen., for appellee (defendant commissioner of motor vehicles). Philip H. Smith, for th...

Judge Panel: In this opinion BALDWIN, C.J., and KING and SHEA, JJ., concurred. Before BALDWIN, C J, and KING, MURPHY, SHEA and ALCORN

Case Date: Friday May 18, 1962

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

182 A.2d 11 (Conn. 1962), Crouchley v. Pambianchi

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Alabama - 123 So. 33 (Ala. 1929), 3 Div. 890, Wright v. Aldridge
Connecticut - 167 A. 823 (Conn. 1933), Lazarevich v. Stoeckel
Connecticut - 30 A. 165 (Conn. 1894), Styles v. Tyler
Connecticut - 106 A.2d 160 (Conn. 1954), Bardes v. Zoning Bd. of City of Stamford
Connecticut - 169 A.2d 652 (Conn. 1961), Heiberger v. Clark

See all quotations