180 S.E.2d 293 (Ga.App. 1971), 45494, Cota v. Alexander

Citation: 180 S.E.2d 293, 123 Ga.App. 219

Opinion Judge: EVANS, Judge.

Party Name: Emmett F. COTA v. Grant ALEXANDER.

Attorney: Where the testimony is in conflict as to whether or not the sum sued for was the balance of personal loans made to the defendant by the plaintiff or sums advanced by him as unconditional payments for services rendered, the trial court erred in directing the verdict and in rendering judgment again...

Judge Panel: BELL, C.J., and EBERHARDT, PANNELL, QUILLIAN and WHITMAN, JJ., concur. HALL and JORDAN, P. JJ., and DEEN, J., dissent. DEEN, Judge (dissenting).

Case Date: January 27, 1971

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

180 S.E.2d 293 (Ga.App. 1971), 45494, Cota v. Alexander

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 123 S.E. 171 (Ga.App. 1924), 15060, Thompson v. Neely & Wilcox
Georgia - 152 S.E. 151 (Ga.App. 1930), 19566, Fried v. Portis Bros. Hat Co.
Georgia - 187 S.E. 904 (Ga.App. 1936), 25587, Smith v. Franklin Printing Co., Inc.
Georgia - 119 S.E.2d 289 (Ga.App. 1961), 38784, Foster v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.
Georgia - 126 S.E.2d 295 (Ga.App. 1962), 39537, Roxy Furniture & Novelty Co. v. Brand

See all quotations