180 N.E.2d 184 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1961), Bowlds v. Smith

Citation: 180 N.E.2d 184, 114 Ohio App. 21

Opinion Judge: SMITH, Presiding Judge. SMITH, P. J.

Party Name: BOWLDS et al., Appellants, v. SMITH, Appellee.

Attorney: stated, the proper procedure to bring this to the court's attention is by demurrer and not by motion for summary judgment., Bugbee, Johnston & Conkle and Warren D. Wolfe, Toledo, for appellants., Marvyn R. Lachin, Toledo, for appellee. Messrs. Bugbee, Johnston & Conkle and Mr. Warren D. Wolfe, f...

Judge Panel: DEEDS and FESS, JJ., concur.

Case Date: Monday July 03, 1961

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

180 N.E.2d 184 (Ohio App. 6 Dist. 1961), Bowlds v. Smith

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 171 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1948), 4319, Peckham v. Ronrico Corp.
Federal Cases - 58 F.Supp. 601 (D.Mass. 1944), 1583, American Optical Co. v. New Jersey Optical Co.
Federal Cases - 91 F.Supp. 159 (D.Mass. 1950), Civ. A. 7067, Hoague-Sprague Corp. v. Bird & Son
Federal Cases - 147 F.2d 639 (2nd Cir. 1945), 24, United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.
Federal Cases - 130 F.2d 1016 (3rd Cir. 1942), 8002, Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.

See all quotations